Today

Today's published judgments

Costs
Chopsonion Pty Ltd (Controllers Appointed) v Watts Meat Machinery Pty Ltd (No 4) [2025] FCA 636
COSTS — where related proceedings were commenced in the Supreme Court of South Australia before being cross-vested to this Court — where two matters heard and determined at the same time — where applicants succeeded in one matter but failed in the other — where the applicants made numerous offers of settlement including Calderbank offer — where applicant made offer pursuant to r 25.14 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) — whether judgment is more favourable than the terms of the offer — where applicants are entitled to the order of indemnity costs from two business days after offer pursuant to r 25.14 — where consideration of costs which were common to both proceedings — orders made
16 Jun 2025 |  O'SULLIVAN J


Corporations Law
Bio Refining Industries Inc Corporation v Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Eguana Holdings Pty Ltd (Deregistered) [2025] FCA 619
CORPORATIONS – application for reinstatement of registration of company and appointment of liquidator pursuant to s601AH of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – whether plaintiff an aggrieved person – where purpose of proposed reinstatement is to allow company to pursue prospective claim - whether reinstatement would be just – where Australian Securities and Investment Commission does not object to application – application granted
16 Jun 2025 |  YOUNAN J


Industrial Law
Torrens University Australia Limited v Fair Work Ombudsman [2025] FCA 634
INDUSTRIAL LAW – review of compliance notice issued pursuant to s 716(2) of Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – interpretation of Higher Education Industry – Academic Staff – Award 2010 and Higher Education Industry – Academic Staff – Award 2020 (Awards) – construction of “associated working time” in hourly payment rates for lecturing by casual academics in Awards – where associated working time not limited to assessments confined to delivery of single lectures – where compliance notice issued by Fair Work Ombudsman incorrectly construed “associated working time” in Awards –compliance notice cancelled
16 Jun 2025 |  HALLEY J


Costs
Thurston v Fox Sports Australia Pty Limited (No 2) [2025] FCA 626
COSTS – appropriate order for costs given outcome of proceeding where applicants were successful against fourth and fifth respondents, but unsuccessful against first respondent, and sixth, seventh and eighth respondents – whether apportionment costs orders should be made – consideration of “dominant or separable” issue in proceeding – apportionment costs orders made regarding first respondent’s costs – application for indemnity costs – costs payable on party and party basis PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – interim freezing order made over sum of money paid to applicants pursuant to deed of settlement – whether freezing order should be extended until final quantification of costs – whether danger of dissipation – order made that specified sum be retained in applicants’ solicitors’ trust account until final quantification of costs
16 Jun 2025 |  HALLEY J


Practice and Procedure
Chu v Lin, in the matter of Gold Stone Capital Pty Ltd (No 10) [2025] FCA 633
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to discharge stay orders granted by consent – discharge sought on grounds of first defendant’s non-compliance with conditions of stay – where conditions included that first defendant take all steps to sell property and pay proceeds to plaintiffs and controlled moneys account – where no genuine attempt made so far to sell property – where failure to sell property contrasts comparable properties’ campaigns to sell – where conditions included that the first defendant instruct agents and advisors to respond promptly to reasonable requests for information from plaintiffs – where no response provided on multiple occasions – order that the stay be discharged
4 Jun 2025 |  JACKMAN J


Practice and Procedure
BCI Media Group Pty Ltd v CoreLogic Australia Pty Ltd (Review of Registrar’s Decision) [2025] FCA 616
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - Review of a Registrar’s Decision – hearing de novo – whether the respondent requires the provision of further particulars by way of a further amended statement of claim – where it is submitted that the applicant is running an unpleaded inferential case – where a blanket non-admission puts the applicant to proof on its case – where the applicant has steadfastly rejected the view that the way to proof lies in proving an inference – whether such an unpleaded inferential case arises – authorities considered – no unpleaded inferential case found – review application dismissed.
12 Jun 2025 |  NEEDHAM J


Consumer Law
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emma Sleep GmbH [2025] FCA 618
CONSUMER LAW – misleading and deceptive conduct and false and misleading representations about goods or services under ss 18 and 29(1)(i) of the Australian Consumer Law – agreed statement of facts – liability admitted in respect of Australian subsidiary in corporate group for certain representations – whether German parent company (Emma Sleep GmbH) or Philippines related company (Bettzeit) are also liable for those representations – conduct “on behalf of ” a body corporate under s 139B(2) of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) (CCA) – attribution of conduct of a subsidiary company to a parent company or related company – Bettzeit liable for impugned representations, both by virtue of s 139B(2)(b)(i) of the CCA and as a principal contravener – Emma Sleep GmbH not liable
16 Jun 2025 |  HILL J


Costs
Caporaso Pty Ltd v Mercato Centrale Australia Pty Ltd (No 3) [2025] FCA 624
COSTS – action alleging trade mark infringement and other causes – cross-claim seeking cancellation of trade marks – respondent and cross-claimant ultimately successful – where parties had varying degrees of success on discrete factual and legal issues – where applicant abandoned some claims mid-trial – whether applicant should pay a portion of the first respondent’s costs
13 Jun 2025 |  CHARLESWORTH J


Bankruptcy
Spring, in the matter of Goal Group Australia Pty Ltd (in liquidation) (No 3) [2025] FCA 632
BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY – where company identified and managed potential recoveries for clients in securities class actions – whether liquidators justified in causing company to pay Citizens Funds Entitlements to each Citizens Client on ground that Citizen Clients are respectively beneficially entitled to them – whether liquidators justified in treating Citizens Commission as funds beneficially owned by company
13 Jun 2025 |  JACKMAN J


Corporations Law
Vinyl Group Ltd, in the matter of Vinyl Group Ltd [2025] FCA 595
CORPORATIONS – where omission to lodge “cleansing notices” pursuant to s 708A(5) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) within time subsequent to the issuing of shares –– where omission by company inadvertent and not subject to dishonesty – application under s 1322 – honesty of conduct – no substantial injustice is likely to be caused – application granted
5 Jun 2025 |  MOORE J


Was this page useful?

What did you like about it?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

How can we make it better?

If you would like the Court to contact you about your website feedback enter your email address in the box below. If you need help with a Court matter, visit the Contact Us pages or go to Live Chat.

* This online submission is protected by captcha


');o.document.close();e.style.display="block";window.addEventListener("message",function(t){if(t.data.action=="close_tls_alert"){i.s()}})},s:function(){var t=document.getElementById("tls_al_frm");t.remove()}};i.t(function(t){});